secondavenuesagas.com Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the secondavenuesagas.com

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host secondavenuesagas.com. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Amazon Technologies Inc. .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.4.7 (Ubuntu) PHP/5.5.9-1ubuntu4.7 containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

home about contact me 2nd ave. subway history search aug 05 as the l train turns: inside the supplemental environmental assessment by benjamin kabak · comments (20) · the latest mta documents include detailed analyses of the anticipated travel patterns during the upcoming l train shutdown. the dog days of summer are not often busy ones for transit news in new york city. faulty subway air conditioning usually dominates complaints as the general malaise of sweltering platforms and sub-par service settles in. but this year, with the 2019 l train closure inching ever closer, august will host a transit hearing. scheduled for monday at 5 p.m., the mta will host a public comment session on its latest and greatest supplemental environmental assessment statement concerning the mitigation plans for the l train shutdown. the document itself has been available online for a few weeks and has a bit of a controversial history as it was not published until well after a group of west village residents filed a controversial lawsuit against the mta, nyc dot and federal transit administration over the l train shutdown. as i wrote in april, i don’t believe this suit has much merit, and in recent court filings, the defendants have argued to dismiss the suit entirely. essentially, the mta, nyc dot and the fta have all claimed that arthur schwartz and his plaintiffs do not have standing, are asserting claims not yet ready for adjudication and/or has gotten the facts wrong in multiple filings. i’m amused by that last part, but it’s neither here nor there right now. soon the judge will likely dismiss the case, but it hasn’t been without its successes. notably, the mta has axed plans to install a platform edge door trial at the l train’s 3rd ave. stop to fund ada upgrades at the l train’s closed stations. this decision was the right one, and it came out directly as a result of the lawsuit. second, the feds and the mta released the supplemental environmental assessment that forms the basis for monday’s public comment session and was a major element of schwartz’s lawsuit. with the ea on hand and the finding that the mta/nyc dot mitigation plan will be more beneficial to the city while creating to significant adverse impacts, schwartz’s main claim essentially disappears. he could re-file a suit alleging that the ea is wrong, but judges overwhelming give deference to government agencies in their findings in these types of assessments. it’s unlikely schwartz was succeed in stopping any of the mitigation plans on substantive grounds so long as the government follows the right procedures in making their determination. but my legal analysis aside, the ea is an interesting document but not for the reasons you may suspect. by and large, it doesn’t tell us anything we don’t already know and haven’t heard over and over again from the mta. it charts in painstaking detail the various mitigation plans (which the mta distilled into a handy pdf visual a few days ago). but i found a few parts worth examining. first, the main document uses the “temporary” 409 times in about 125 pages. the mta and fta have gone out of their way to underscore how the mitigation plans — the 14th st. busway, the bike lanes on adjacent streets, the hov restrictions across the williamsburg bridge, the brooklyn-manhattan bus routes, all of it — are temporary. this too is designed to head off a lawsuit claiming the l train shutdown is serving as cover for the city to implement transit improvements without following the painstakingly long and arduous community board process. if these measures prove successful, the city should push to make some of them permanent, but that’s a story for another day. the other part i found interesting is in the appendices [ pdf ], and it includes a detailed breakdown of the mta’s alternatives analysis regarding the l train shutdown. although the mta had previously told the public that it had considered a one-tube-at-a-time approach to the work or a nights-and-weekends option, the agency had never gone into detail as to why it opted against either of these approaches until this supplemental environmental assessment came out. first, the mta readily dismissed the nights-and-weekends plan as technically infeasible. the overall timeline for work was up to a decade, and the agency determined that a 55-hour weekend window would be around 25-30 hours too short to ensure the air in the tunnel is free from silica dust, causing service delays well into the work week. while the one-tube approach survived the first cut, the mta determined that it failed on additional specific criteria. with just one tube of the l train open, the mta worried about “severe overcrowding” and would have needed to implement significant mitigation plans as it will next year while completing work in 36 months rather than 15. “the only way to reduce l train overcrowding in this scenario would be to provide a robust alternative service plan of a similar magnitude to the one proposed for the double-track closure,” the document states. ultimately, the single-track plan fared worse on every analytical criteria, and an overwhelming majority of l train riders preferred the shorter, full-time shutdown. it’s all laid out in print in painstaking detail, largely in response to schwartz’s claims that the mta hadn’t conducted (or released) this analysis. ultimately, this supplemental environmental analysis document is one the mta should have released from the get-go with the level of detail contained in the appendices. the agency opened itself up to potential lawsuits by not doing so, and an air of opacity settled around the project. this was a self-inflicted wound and one that should have been avoided. but with the ea public, the dirty laundry has been aired, and legal objections to the l train shutdown and mitigation plans should now be dismissed. and now how about extending that busway all the way across town? categories : l train shutdown comments (20) jul 31 on the effect and cause of the mta’s ridership decline by benjamin kabak · comments (36) · a monday meltdown reinforces why transit ridership is down across nyc. (source: mta) monday morning dawned in new york city yesterday as it so often does these days: with a total mta meltdown. the problem this time came about because of a year-long project to fix a stretch of tunnel under 4th ave. about which the mta forgot to tell riders and somehow messed up the go. thanks to a typo, the d, n and r were all running local and wooden plywood formed a surprising barrier on the express tracks. as complaints on social media piled up and no one knew what was happening, riders flocked to any other possible route — ferries, ubers, whatever they could find. later in the day, the mta determined that a typo caused the meltdown, and aaron gordon did a deep dive into the mess that was. as gordon discussed, because the work order identified the wrong signal as the end point of the construction zone, d trains were routed onto the local tracks, and the entire 4th ave. line south of atlantic ave. was thrown into disarray. furthermore, since transit had scheduled this work as a long-term change, the internal communications staff didn’t realize it required special word to passengers in the form of station posters and announcements. thus, the powers-that-be at transit simply didn’t know they needed to make an effort to bring word of these service changes to commuters during rush hour on a monday morning. the agency struck an apologetic tone. sarah meyer, transit’s new-ish chief customer officer, issued a lengthy statement about the issue (which notes how the blue wall actually improves service and eliminates the need for flagging). “we deeply apologize for our significant errors today and know that we need to do better,” meyer (a long-time classmate of mine in elementary and high school) said. “we are working through our policies and procedures to ensure this does not happen again.” but happen again it does

URL analysis for secondavenuesagas.com

http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/7-line-extension/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/capital-program-2015-2019/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/us-transit-systems/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/comments/feed/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/view-from-underground/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/new-york-city-transit/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/paratransit/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/subway-security/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/penn-station/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/subway-movies/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/rolling-stock/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/asides/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/2018/08/05/l-train-turns-inside-supplemental-environmental-assessment/#comments
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/capital-program-2010-2014/
http://secondavenuesagas.com/category/subway-romance/

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

Domain Name: SECONDAVENUESAGAS.COM
Registry Domain ID: 797263883_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.godaddy.com
Registrar URL: http://www.godaddy.com
Updated Date: 2018-02-06T14:06:53Z
Creation Date: 2007-02-05T20:21:28Z
Registry Expiry Date: 2019-02-05T20:21:28Z
Registrar: GoDaddy.com, LLC
Registrar IANA ID: 146
Registrar Abuse Contact Email: [email protected]
Registrar Abuse Contact Phone: 480-624-2505
Domain Status: clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
Domain Status: clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
Domain Status: clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
Domain Status: clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited
Name Server: NS-1136.AWSDNS-14.ORG
Name Server: NS-197.AWSDNS-24.COM
Name Server: NS-2041.AWSDNS-63.CO.UK
Name Server: NS-862.AWSDNS-43.NET
DNSSEC: unsigned
URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form: https://www.icann.org/wicf/
>>> Last update of whois database: 2018-12-04T08:14:55Z <<<

For more information on Whois status codes, please visit https://icann.org/epp

NOTICE: The expiration date displayed in this record is the date the
registrar's sponsorship of the domain name registration in the registry is
currently set to expire. This date does not necessarily reflect the expiration
date of the domain name registrant's agreement with the sponsoring
registrar. Users may consult the sponsoring registrar's Whois database to
view the registrar's reported date of expiration for this registration.

TERMS OF USE: You are not authorized to access or query our Whois
database through the use of electronic processes that are high-volume and
automated except as reasonably necessary to register domain names or
modify existing registrations; the Data in VeriSign Global Registry
Services' ("VeriSign") Whois database is provided by VeriSign for
information purposes only, and to assist persons in obtaining information
about or related to a domain name registration record. VeriSign does not
guarantee its accuracy. By submitting a Whois query, you agree to abide
by the following terms of use: You agree that you may use this Data only
for lawful purposes and that under no circumstances will you use this Data
to: (1) allow, enable, or otherwise support the transmission of mass
unsolicited, commercial advertising or solicitations via e-mail, telephone,
or facsimile; or (2) enable high volume, automated, electronic processes
that apply to VeriSign (or its computer systems). The compilation,
repackaging, dissemination or other use of this Data is expressly
prohibited without the prior written consent of VeriSign. You agree not to
use electronic processes that are automated and high-volume to access or
query the Whois database except as reasonably necessary to register
domain names or modify existing registrations. VeriSign reserves the right
to restrict your access to the Whois database in its sole discretion to ensure
operational stability. VeriSign may restrict or terminate your access to the
Whois database for failure to abide by these terms of use. VeriSign
reserves the right to modify these terms at any time.

The Registry database contains ONLY .COM, .NET, .EDU domains and
Registrars.

  REGISTRAR GoDaddy.com, LLC

SERVERS

  SERVER com.whois-servers.net

  ARGS domain =secondavenuesagas.com

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

DOMAIN

  NAME secondavenuesagas.com

  CHANGED 2018-02-06

  CREATED 2007-02-05

STATUS
clientDeleteProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientDeleteProhibited
clientRenewProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientRenewProhibited
clientTransferProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientTransferProhibited
clientUpdateProhibited https://icann.org/epp#clientUpdateProhibited

NSERVER

  NS-1136.AWSDNS-14.ORG 205.251.196.112

  NS-197.AWSDNS-24.COM 205.251.192.197

  NS-2041.AWSDNS-63.CO.UK 205.251.199.249

  NS-862.AWSDNS-43.NET 205.251.195.94

  REGISTERED yes

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .